The balance of local, regional, national and global matters is a tricky one.
I've been following Twitter a bit closer than usual for the past few days/weeks, just to see what I see. There is chatter, affirmation, occasional howls of derision or anger, and lots of immediate reflection on what people are encountering. I love the witty ones (@RevRichardColes is a bit of a winner) and those that make me stop and think.
Links to blogs (5minsspace.blogspot.com), or images (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A9YAkpACMAE_fgG.jpg:large), or news items(@skynewsbreak etc.) are well worth following for a click or two: I suppose it's like dropping yourself into the consciousness of hundreds of other people as they look at the world and reflect how they feel about it, filtered or otherwise.
My own tweets tend to be locked in the local. The weather, bit of ministry, things that are happening to me. Tentative replies to others' tweets I sometimes try, and sometime get a response or a conversation. I suspect one has to commit much more time to Twitter to really, really take off. I have a mere 800 or so tweets and a mere 200 or so followers. It's a long way until I end up as a 'verified identity,' I suspect.
The local nature of my tweets is also because of the local focus of life. Ministry is inevitably rooted in the place where you are (I think I blogged about trying to be present recently), and the people that you are with. And if ministry is taking up your energy and attention, then attempts to relate on social media will be local.
Does that mean that Leveson, or Syria, or Stuart Hall, or George Osborne, or even @Pontiflex are being ignored? Far from it: I read the tweets of others who have analysed and responded, linked and reacted. Twitter can act as a social conscience, without a doubt.
This Advent: another resolution. Tweets on every scale, every week if possible.
Footnote: I've consciously noticed three 'verified identities' this week (public figures as chosen by Twitter): the Pope, Nicky Gumbel and Mike Russell.