Showing posts with label Scottish Episcopal Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scottish Episcopal Church. Show all posts
Friday, 6 December 2013
Global grace and connection
This is an image of the 'Peary Spirit,' an oil tanker, as she rounds Strone point and moves up Loch Long, towards (I assume) the Finnart Oil Terminal. Apparently there are pipes that connect Finnart to Grangemouth Oil Refinery, built in the 1950s to allow crude to be imported via the west.
Why am I blogging this today? I spotted the vessel as she came up the Clyde after I paused for my usual 'in-car-office' on the sea front, prayers said from my phone. She progressed from a (quite large) blur down near Arran and passed by where I was.
ShipAIS is a useful tool for the marine aficionados of Argyll: click to the right map and there's a live feed of whatever is passing you at that minute. So I, an Anglican priest, sat on the sea front in Argyll, saying my prayers, was being passed by a vessel built in Korea (by the chaebol Samsung, who also made the phone I was looking her up on), owned by a Canadian company, flying the flag of Barbados and quite probably crewed by Filipinos. Taking oil (from Shetland, according to her ShipAIS history) to the west of Scotland, to be made into petrochemical products in the east of Scotland. For example, the diesel that my car was burning to keep me warm and keep my phone charged as I did all this stuff.
The interconnectedness of it all occasionally smacks us between the eyes and shows us the invisible connections that hold the human world together. One can go down a route of Anglicanism: the Scottish Episcopal Church as the local manifestation of a church that also exists in all those places, nearly 80 million followers, as diverse as the culture and countries that it tries to align. Or one can go down a route of globalisation through technology (culminating in the chaebol created, lawsuit protected smartphone that allowed the prayers/knowledge/research to take place and reveal the connected lines...). Or one could just thank God for his gracious gifts in all that we see and all that we know.
And finish with the grace.
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit, be with us all, evermore
Labels:
Anglicanism,
connection,
Grace,
oil,
Prayer,
Scottish Episcopal Church,
ships
Saturday, 26 October 2013
Social media and the gospel... #thatoldchestnut
I wonder how many times those words have been typed as people submit their topic for a MPhil/PhD/thesis/magazine article etc. etc. etc.
We seem to feel that social media and getting the Christian message over must be important in some way or other. I share that view. I tweet. I blip. I (occasionally) update my Facebook status. I blog.
Twitter is probably the most fertile area for this sort of thing. I'm convinced the power of the 140 character message will grow and grow. It is punchy, wide reaching, linkable and effective. It can challenge regimes, point out tasteless products and gather and influence public opinion. It's great. It's not coincidence that eveyr product, every TV programme, every magazine has a #hashtag and a @username
How do Christians tweet?
There are 'vicarbots' who post snippets of scripture to uplift and challenge. They are usually unfollowed pretty fast. There are trendy/sharp Christian tweeters, always making witty asides and observations. There are tired and faithful Christians sharing their journey. And many, many more.
Does any of it proclaim the gospel? I suppose (vicarbots aside, despite what they think) is does. There are men, women and children sharing their journeys, mutually supporting each other and generally trying to work out what it means to be a person of faith in the 21st century. Life goes on in Twitter, just as it does in RL: and Christian life is just the same.
I'm off for some corporate church comms meetings in Edinburgh next week. I've only been to one so far, and the overriding concern at that one about Twitter was how to prevent the (corporate) church being taken to court for something this is tweeted by a clergyperson. That is a rather underwhelming take on engaging with the world of social media: pre-emptive damage limitation. Oh well.
So I will go on tweeting (I try, usually vainly, to be amusing and show that stuff is happening). But I will also visit, I will meet, I will drink cups of tea and try to live a sustainable and balanced life as a human being, a priest and a person who follows and has been transformed by Jesus Christ...
@midgedancer
We seem to feel that social media and getting the Christian message over must be important in some way or other. I share that view. I tweet. I blip. I (occasionally) update my Facebook status. I blog.
Twitter is probably the most fertile area for this sort of thing. I'm convinced the power of the 140 character message will grow and grow. It is punchy, wide reaching, linkable and effective. It can challenge regimes, point out tasteless products and gather and influence public opinion. It's great. It's not coincidence that eveyr product, every TV programme, every magazine has a #hashtag and a @username
How do Christians tweet?
There are 'vicarbots' who post snippets of scripture to uplift and challenge. They are usually unfollowed pretty fast. There are trendy/sharp Christian tweeters, always making witty asides and observations. There are tired and faithful Christians sharing their journey. And many, many more.
Does any of it proclaim the gospel? I suppose (vicarbots aside, despite what they think) is does. There are men, women and children sharing their journeys, mutually supporting each other and generally trying to work out what it means to be a person of faith in the 21st century. Life goes on in Twitter, just as it does in RL: and Christian life is just the same.
I'm off for some corporate church comms meetings in Edinburgh next week. I've only been to one so far, and the overriding concern at that one about Twitter was how to prevent the (corporate) church being taken to court for something this is tweeted by a clergyperson. That is a rather underwhelming take on engaging with the world of social media: pre-emptive damage limitation. Oh well.
So I will go on tweeting (I try, usually vainly, to be amusing and show that stuff is happening). But I will also visit, I will meet, I will drink cups of tea and try to live a sustainable and balanced life as a human being, a priest and a person who follows and has been transformed by Jesus Christ...
@midgedancer
Labels:
church,
Scottish Episcopal Church,
social media,
twitter
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
Two southern provinces and their clergy...
A little while ago the Church of England just failed to pass a measure that (as its principal function) would have allowed women to become bishops in that church (the Anglican provinces of York and Canterbury). It was nail-bitingly close, and one of the houses just didn't quite make the 2/3 majority needed.
Why care? As a Scottish Episcopal priest, it won't affect life. We are allowed women bishops up here already. At that point the complacency ends. We haven't had one, although there have been attempts (we vote for bishops up here). Staggeringly few women are even in the few senior posts in the church, the deans and the provosts. Only ever 2 female provosts and one female dean. Not a particularly good track record. But it takes years for a change to flow through a church, especially one that is contentious from a theological or traditional view.
I was ordained in England, and have many, many friends in ministry there. Some of them are wrapped up in the campaign for women's episcopal ministry. They will be hurting very much this evening.
But the vote was much more subtle than just the straightforward issue of gender justice, as Kelvin points out. The continued issue of maintaining a sanctuary for traditionalists who don't wish to accept the ministry of women bishops has also been rejected. That was a live issue when I was still in the C of E, and I found myself taking a rather hardline against any compromise, and signing petitions etc. against such measures. Go and see how green the grass of non-conformism or the ordinariate actually is, I muttered.
But how pyrrhic a victory is rejecting compromise at the expense of delaying female bishops for further years? It is a hard, hard place that many English clergy will find themselves tomorrow morning. Many of them have tweeted 'Ashamed to be Anglican,' and rather than pedantically correcting them, I share some sympathy.
Our house in Scotland is equally not in order from a gender justice point of view: no sanctuary for traditionalists, a canonical structure that allows female bishops: and we have still not made it...
And as for the issue of some other moratoria. We'll let that lie for the moment.
Why care? As a Scottish Episcopal priest, it won't affect life. We are allowed women bishops up here already. At that point the complacency ends. We haven't had one, although there have been attempts (we vote for bishops up here). Staggeringly few women are even in the few senior posts in the church, the deans and the provosts. Only ever 2 female provosts and one female dean. Not a particularly good track record. But it takes years for a change to flow through a church, especially one that is contentious from a theological or traditional view.
I was ordained in England, and have many, many friends in ministry there. Some of them are wrapped up in the campaign for women's episcopal ministry. They will be hurting very much this evening.
But the vote was much more subtle than just the straightforward issue of gender justice, as Kelvin points out. The continued issue of maintaining a sanctuary for traditionalists who don't wish to accept the ministry of women bishops has also been rejected. That was a live issue when I was still in the C of E, and I found myself taking a rather hardline against any compromise, and signing petitions etc. against such measures. Go and see how green the grass of non-conformism or the ordinariate actually is, I muttered.
But how pyrrhic a victory is rejecting compromise at the expense of delaying female bishops for further years? It is a hard, hard place that many English clergy will find themselves tomorrow morning. Many of them have tweeted 'Ashamed to be Anglican,' and rather than pedantically correcting them, I share some sympathy.
Our house in Scotland is equally not in order from a gender justice point of view: no sanctuary for traditionalists, a canonical structure that allows female bishops: and we have still not made it...
And as for the issue of some other moratoria. We'll let that lie for the moment.
Labels:
Anglicans,
bishop,
Church of England,
Scottish Episcopal Church,
synod,
women
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
